Presentation by Corporate Attorney in Pakistan:
For representation in cases through attorney in Pakistan or corporate lawyers in Lahore you may contact Jamila Law Associates. The provision is mandatory. The Court can presume that the requirements of the proper execution of the power-of-attorney have been duly fulfilled through attorney in Pakistan or corporate lawyers in Lahore. Moreover, different legal modes of executing a power-of-attorney and the provisions of section 85 are not exhaustive.A power-of-attorney was executed for the execution and presentation of a sale deed for registration. The vendor was in the United States.
The first power-of-attorney executed for the purpose was not duly authenticated. However, the second power-of-attorney was executed duly authenticated and noticed the first being defective and ratifying. The effect and implications thereof came up before the Supreme Court in Jugraj Singh v. Jaswant Singh. The Supreme Court observed as follows– The presentation for registration can be either by the principal or by a duly constituted attorney through attorney in Pakistan or corporate lawyers in Lahore. It is equally plain that a power-of-attorney duly authenticated as required by law had to be made before it could confer power on another to execute the document or present it for registration. That indeed is the law.”
The Court Observed:
The Court observed. A power-of-attorney for executing the document and presenting it for recording Now, if we were to take into account the first power-of-attorney, which was executed in his favor on May 29, 1963, it could be said that it did not fulfill the requirements of the law and was ineffective to clothe Mr. C with authority to execute the sale-deed or to present it for registration through attorney in Pakistan or corporate lawyers in Lahore.
Corporate Lawyer in Lahore:
That power-of-attorney was authenticated through attorney in Pakistan or corporate lawyers in Lahore as required by section 33 of the Indian Registration Act, which requires that a Notary Public authenticate the document in the case of an Indian residing abroad. However, the second power-of-attorney shows that it executed it before a proper Notary Public, who complied with California’s laws and authenticated the document as required by that law. We are satisfied that power-of-attorney is also duly authenticated by our laws through attorney in Pakistan or corporate lawyers in Lahore. The only complaint is that the Notary Public did not say li.
His endorsement that Mr. C had been identified to his satisfaction. The flows from the fact that he endorsed the document that it had been sworn before him. There is a presumption of regularity of the acts. It makes the second power-of-attorney valid and effective under both sections, section 85 of the Evidence Act and section 33 of the Registration Act. In this connection, it may note that the Indian Evidence Act under section 87 does not prescribe any particular form of authentication by the Notary Public. Normally, therefore, an attestation of the Notary to the effect that “subscribed and sworn before me” is a valid authentication. Justice Yogeshwar Dayal considered the effect of notarization in the light of section 85 in National Grindlays Bank v. World Science News.’ In the facts of the case, the Court observed that the document in the present case is a power-of-attorney and again on its face shows to have been executed before and authenticated by a notary public through attorney in Pakistan or corporate lawyers in Lahore.
Read more about Difference Between diner VS Dinner